Monday, November 29, 2010

Raising Money for Charity – Proven Techniques from Psychology


In these difficult economic times, many non-profit organizations that rely on charitable donations are finding it difficult to raise funds to cover expenses. The people who donated in the past may have since lost a job, taken a pay cut, or needed to rework the household budget. Yet, the missions of these organizations are still relevant, if not more relevant: there is more need for shelter, food, safety, and education. The need for charities has not gone away, even though so much of the funding has.
I was listening to one plea for help recently, where a very well meaning person addressed the audience saying that out of so many possible donors, only this small percentage had made a donation so far. It seemed to me that the intent was to use guilt as a motivation. “We are relying on so few to do so much. You should be doing your fair share!” is the unspoken message. Given my background in psychological research, I realized that the actual message was quite different. In reality this person was saying “You probably have not given any money for this cause, and you are not alone. In fact most people have not given anything so far. Times really are bad, and you are right to hold on to your money in case of emergency. Let someone else give the money.” How do I know this is the actual message?
When you read the academic description of experiments and field studies, you see that people pay attention to what the norm is. You know the old saying: “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” Actually, we do this all the time. Don’t believe me? Try a little experiment. Get some of your friends to accompany you to the mall or the city or some public location where other people will be walking by. First, try looking straight up to the sky, as if there is something very important that you need to stare at. Have a friend stand some distance away and write down the number of people who look up to see what you are looking at. Then, have two or more of your friends look up at the same spot with you, and still have that other friend write down the number people who look up. If you choose a good spot, and if you spend an equal amount of time on the first and second condition, you should get results that match the findings from social psychology. Specifically, when a group of 3 or more individuals are doing something, they cause other people to do the same thing. The larger the group, the stronger the persuasion. The more uncertain the situation, the stronger the persuasion. Human beings are often called social animals, and our reliance on social norms is a good example of why we get that name. We want to fit in, and we are less inclined to act in a way that is different from what others are doing. There are documented cases of increasing recycling behavior and reducing household electricity use just by sharing certain aspects of what many other community members are doing. That same “social pressure” can be used to encourage individuals to reconsider their charitable contributions, and the techniques are both ethical and subtle.
If you want to elicit donations from a group of people, you should be creating the sense that everyone is contributing. You should create a social norm, where giving money is the thing to do. How? Clearly in the beginning of a fund raising drive, most people have NOT given money. What if the norm that you want doesn’t exist?
First, it is important to highlight an example of someone who really represents the population and who has also made a donation. Perhaps that person stands up at a meeting or is highlighted in a newsletter. Secondly, that person should be talking about more than just reasons to donate, but also how to make room in the budget. For example, John could stand up and say that giving a $1,000 donation seemed impossible to him at first, but then he realized that if he could save $50 on twenty occasions, he would have the money set aside—really, than meant skipping one family trip to the restaurant every other week. He realizes that not everyone is in the same situation, but maybe others can find a way to put aside money that they didn’t realize was accumulating towards other things, like movie channels or cell phone options. Suddenly, John has everyone thinking about trivial expenses that aren’t really necessary. Of course, if Mary makes a donation after hearing this short speech, then she can also stand up and talk about how she made it work.
Soon, statistics can be shared, such as the fact that 100 people made donations so far, and all their pictures are posted by the door. “In fact, some of these people will greet you as you leave today. Be sure to thank them for their generosity.” Make that 100 number seem very large and yet also very personal. By focusing on the successes, you can create the perception that people just like me are contributing. Eventually, when you know that you are over 50% participation, you can ask everyone at a meeting to stand up if they have made a donation. Suddenly, it seems that everyone is joining this worthy cause… and I should, too. At this point, it is important to make it very easy for people to join in. If people are not sure how to make a contribution, then pass out a card with options. If some people are interested, but not taking out a checkbook, then hand them a form to collect their phone number and address so that someone can follow up on the best way to fulfill a pledge today.
Remember, pay attention to the perception of how many people are joining in, and make that perception work for you rather than against you. Be creative, and show evidence of multiplying support. People will know what to do when they see the norm.


This content is protected by the 1976 Copyright Protection Act of the United States of America. The proper citation for this blog is as follows: Mastrangelo, P. M. (date posted). Title of Post. Bump on a Blog, available at http://paulmastrangelo.blogspot.com. This post is not intended to represent any person or organization other than Paul M. Mastrangelo.

Sunday, August 08, 2010

Community Portals, Social Capital, and Behavioral Change

If you are looking to promote a behavioral change in a community, it helps to understand what social networks exist within that population and how you can communicate with them. This is the main feature in "Viral Marketing" campaigns, where a very specific message is targeted toward a small sub-population rather than a broad message intended for the large population. Businesses often target the 20% of the market who consume 80% of their products, for example. Once you identify who those folks are, how do you reach them? Frequently, a group of individuals with a common interest find each other—no matter how odd their shared experience may be, no matter if the larger population doesn't know the group exists. Similar individuals form networks, and you can access their networks once you find their “portal.”

I started thinking about portals after the birth of my first child. My wife and I would alternate time at work with time with Ally, and over time we sought sources of entertainment beyond videos and parental imagination. We discovered portals into groups of parents just like us, looking for adult conversation with fun, safe activities with playmates for our kids. These gateways included story hours at the local bookstore (who knew?), "Mommy and Me" hours at a community center gym that was filled with donated toys, and play centers where (for a fee) the staff would arrange for different activities each week. We made friends with working parents going through the same struggles that we faced. What I found fascinating is that these parental hotspots weren't new, I was. I never noticed them before. Owning a dog for the first time provides another example of portals. I never knew there were parks set aside for dogs and their owners. Now, I realize that owners frequent these parks daily, and they often know each other by their dogs' names. One morning my dog was greeted with "Hey, Rocco! How are you boy?" quickly followed by a question for me, "Is it your wife I saw with him yesterday?"

I started thinking that portals to various social networks must be everywhere, hiding in plain sight; however, I have discovered that communities are collapsing across the US. This past December I was in Colangelo's Bakery, one of the few Italian bakeries in Rochester that made Tomato Pie (similar to the bakery pizza strips found all over Rhode Island)...one of my all time favorite foods. I was saddened to hear that they were closing down the shop and hoping to recreate their business online through orders and catering. I started wondering where you find the portal for young, Italian Americans who grew up with ethnic foods and traditions that are now dying out, as Italian neighborhoods disappear and first generation Americans are no longer with us. I then picked up the 2000 book Bowling Alone (by Robert D. Putnam) and learned that I stumbled on to a trend that goes beyond just Italian-American traditions. Both formal and informal types of social connections—Rotary Clubs, VFW posts, neighborhood barbeques, and yes, bowling leagues—are all becoming less a part of America than they were for the WWII generation. And it’s not just my local bakery that suffers. In fact, Putnam persuasively argues that when there is less communal interconnection, we ALL suffer because we lose out on “social capital.”

How?

Check out the Social Capital Primer on Harvard’s Saguaro Seminar website:

The central premise of social capital is that social networks have value. Social capital refers to the collective value of all "social networks" [who people know] and the inclinations that arise from these networks to do things for each other ["norms of reciprocity"].

How does social capital work?
The term social capital emphasizes not just warm and cuddly feelings, but a wide variety of quite specific benefits that flow from the trust, reciprocity, information, and cooperation associated with social networks. Social capital creates value for the people who are connected and - at least sometimes - for bystanders as well.

Social capital works through multiple channels:
- Information flows (e.g. learning about jobs, learning about candidates running for office, exchanging ideas at college, etc.) depend on social capital.
- Norms of reciprocity (mutual aid) rely on social networks. Bonding networks that connect folks who are similar sustain particularized (in-group) reciprocity. Bridging networks that connect individuals who are diverse sustain generalized reciprocity.
- Collective action depends upon social networks (e.g., the role that the black church played in the Civil Rights movement) although collective action also can foster new networks.
- Broader identities and solidarity are encouraged by social networks that help translate an "I" mentality into a "we" mentality.

What are some examples of social capital?
When a group of neighbors informally keep an eye on one another's homes, that's social capital in action. When a tightly knit community of Hassidic Jews trade diamonds without having to test each gem for purity, that's social capital in action. Barn-raising on the frontier was social capital in action, and so too are e-mail exchanges among members of a cancer support group. Social capital can be found in friendship networks, neighborhoods, churches, schools, bridge clubs, civic associations, and even bars. The motto in Cheers "where everybody knows your name" captures one important aspect of social capital.

In the workplace, these behaviors are similar to what OD specialists call employee engagement, specifically the discretionary effort that employees exhibit to make organizations work more effectively and efficiently—quite the opposite of turf wars, bureaucracy, sabotage, and harassment. In the government, these behaviors are similar to the “across the aisle” cooperation that is sorely missing in our political arena full of soundbites and polarizing rhetoric. In the schoolyard, these behaviors are similar to the peace-keeping we see as necessary to prevent bullying, shootings, and suicides. On the highways, these are the communal behaviors that ease tensions in traffic jams and prevent road rage. This is way beyond my Tomato Pie. What can we do?

Where social networks still exist, mostly due to having a set of people in close proximity such as at a workplace, a neighborhood, a church, or a school, it is important to strengthen social bonds. We have to become role models for outreach: stopping by for visits, hosting get-togethers, connecting individuals who would benefit from knowing each other, etc. This may take some effort for some of us, as we have become accustomed to valuing autonomy, privacy, and space rather than interdependence, sharing, and togetherness. As Putnam explains social networks provide a combination of bridging dissimilar individuals and bonding similar individuals. We need both forms of social capital, and where one member promotes these connections successfully, more members will step up and follow suit, providing opportunities for future shared experiences.

Where there are weak or no social networks, it is important to provide a forum for individuals to discover and share their common experiences. Online options, such as Facebook groups or web boards, can be created to draw in individuals who would benefit from connection, but who have yet to connect. These virtual meetings can lead to actual face-to-face meetings, which require a bit more commitment and effort, but provide more potential social capital. In essence communities will form when someone creates a portal for members to find each other.

In order for a group of individuals to feel part of a community, they have to share common experiences. By providing the means for the group to have those experiences and then shaping what those experiences are, one can foster the development of a community, whether the members are employees, neighbors, parents of local school students, or even customers who love tomato pie.

P.S. Those of you in the Rochester area can support Colangelo's Bakery by calling (585) 218-0220. In Rhode Island, my favorite Italian bakery is Palmieri's Bakery... and try their pepper sticks as well as pizza!


This content is protected by the 1976 Copyright Protection Act of the United States of America. The proper citation for this blog is as follows: Mastrangelo, P. M. (date posted). Title of Post. Bump on a Blog, available at http://paulmastrangelo.blogspot.com.

This post is not intended to represent any person or organization other than Paul M. Mastrangelo.